Saturday, June 19, 2010
Waylon Bridges??
Started watching the movie "Crazy Heart" and was struck with the way Jeff B. played the part of main character Bad Blake. The visage and mannerisms reminded me of that old "Okie from Muskogee", Waylon J. Got to wondering if it was more than coincidence.
Friday, June 18, 2010
Not Quite, Wiley
The principle of Occam’s Razor (or principle of Parsimony) that is promoted by this particular Non-Sequitur strip from yesterday is frequently described just like the young man in the strip says, “the obvious answer (or simplest) usually being the correct one”.
However, there are enough instances where this is not the case that it would be better to adopt the proposal that if there are multiple hypothetical solutions to a problem, those being the simplest in nature would be the easiest to test and if proven incorrect, the quickest to reject; but if proven to work, would also be the quickest and most economical in time and effort to support. My (less than) 2 cents worth. Picky, picky, picky. (click image to read the strip)
Saturday, June 12, 2010
Try This
I uploaded a PPT of a slime mold presentation to Scribd and wanted to see if it could be accessed through my blog.
http://www.scribd.com/full/32940722?access_key=key-2m432yxmcvix553x9yd2
I'm curious if this works.
http://www.scribd.com/full/32940722?access_key=key-2m432yxmcvix553x9yd2
I'm curious if this works.
Lamarckianism Anyone?
Today's "Close To Home" comic is a reminder that the idea of evolution being driven by the inheritance of characters modified by patterns of use and disuse of parts is still a popular, albeit a discredited one.
The following is a direct quote from the current Wikipedia treatment of the topic of Jean-Baptiste Lamarck:
"Lamarck constructed one of the first theoretical frameworks of organic evolution. While this theory was generally rejected during his lifetime,[ Stephen Jay Gould argues that Lamarck was the "primary evolutionary theorist", in that his ideas, and the way in which he structured his theory set the tone for much of the subsequent thinking in evolutionary biology, through to the present day.
Lamarck is usually remembered for his belief in the inheritance of acquired characteristics, and the use and disuse model by which organisms developed their characteristics. Lamarck incorporated this belief into his theory of evolution, along with other more common beliefs of the time, such as spontaneous generation. The inheritance of acquired characteristics (also called the theory of adaptation or soft inheritance) was rejected by August Weismann in the 1880s when he developed a theory of inheritance in which germ plasm (the sex cells, later redefined as DNA), remained separate and distinct from the soma (the rest of the body); thus nothing which happens to the soma may be passed on with the germ-plasm. This model underlies the modern understanding of inheritance.
Charles Darwin allowed a role for use and disuse as an evolutionary mechanism subsidiary to natural selection, most often in respect of disuse.] He praised Lamarck for "the eminent service of arousing attention to the probability of all change in the organic... world, being the result of law, not miraculous interposition". Lamarckism is also occasionally used to describe quasi-evolutionary concepts in societal contexts, though not by Lamarck himself. For example, the memetic theory of cultural evolution is sometimes described as a form of Lamarckian inheritance of non-genetic traits.
In contrast to the eventual general rejection of his proposed mechanism for evolution, Lamarck's seven-volume work on the natural history of invertebrates is recognised as a lasting contribution to zoology.
The honeybee subspecies Apis mellifera lamarckii is named after Lamarck, as well as the Bluefire jellyfish (Cyaneia lamarckii): a number of plant species have also been named after him, including Amelanchier lamarckii (Juneberry), Digitalis lamarckii and Aconitum lamarckii."
Sunday, June 6, 2010
Struck By The Resemblance
Saturday, June 5, 2010
"We Have Met The Enemy And He Is Us" Pogo To Porkypine 1971
With all the finger pointing and blame gaming, it should be noted that if everyone didn't use oil and other natural resources faster than is sustainable, and in ways that are difficult without waste and pollution consequences, the chances of "mistakes" would be reduced as well as their severity.
Pogo is still correct in 2010 as he was in 1971 on Earth Day.
Here is a link to some interesting and thoughtful commentary:
http://newsweek.washingtonpost.com/onfaith//2010/06/the_gulf_oil_spill/all.html
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)